Safer Internet Day 2008: 7 reasons why campaigns against online pedophiles must be coordinated

by Urs E. Gattiker on 2008/02/07 1 views

in z uncategorized

using the right media mix does help tremendously
The city of Zurich has launched a campaign for better security in online chats
We tell you, how and why using social media would have given Zurich a greater bang for the buck

The online market features images of pedophilia (nude photographs of children in various poses), hebephilia (youth/teens), and paraphilia (images of bondage).Sexual exploitation of children is definitely an issue we should be concerned about. Hence, any campaign raising awareness and improving prevention regarding this matter must be applauded.2008-02-18 was the Safer Internet Day 2008 – interesting post you find here:Safer Internet Day – Safer Cyberspace – why it might remain a pipe dream


ZURICH’S CAMPAIGN for a SAFER INTERNET FOR OUR CHILDREN

To fight online pedophiles and improve online security for kids in chat rooms, the city of Zurich has launched the first campaign on this matter in Switzerland. Below we discuss some of the reasons why the campaign might have been a greaters success if it would have been coordinated with other activities beyond the city itself (e.g., Safer Internet Day 2008).

Reason 1 Target audience is not clearly defined

The campaign is targeting several groups including children, parents, teachers and the public in general. But this makes achieving success ever more difficult because what works with a 10-year old fails to convince a 15-year old ‘dude.’ Finally, parents need a different message than their children….

Reason 2 Media used to reach out is not preferred by the campaign’s target audience(s)

The campaign is using a few billboards all through town . Messages conveyed are such as that one shown to the left.
But many kids do not get their daily news via billboards or by looking at printed media. One exception might be those dailies available for free in various distribution boxes at bus stops and so on (e.g., 20 minutes, heute, etc.). So how are kids supposed to get the message if they fail to look at the billboards or do not read local newspapers?

Reason 3 Unclear what the campaign is supposed to accomplish

Looking at the campaign’s media coverage, billboards and brochures published, one might get the impression that the campaign is supposed to raise awareness about:

a) pedophiles in online chat rooms,

b) sexual exploitation of children on the Internet, AND

c) how kids can take better security measures in chat rooms and so forth.

But would it not be easier to just focus on better security …. Better security behavior by children using the Internet for such purposes as participating in chat rooms, social networks, using voice over IP to call their friends and so on are all widely used applications. What they have in common is that they all expose children to slightly different types of risks regarding their safety, security and privacy.

Reason 4 Target audience(s) fail to get the message

To launch the campaing, the two city councillors’ – Esther Maurer (police) and Gerold Lauber (education) gave a press conference in late January.

We made a test and asked a few street car and bus riders in Zurich (parents with children) what they thought these billboards were supposed to convey. At least 79% failed to get it.

But maybe the children get the message?

So we asked 4th graders and 7th graders. In one class, about 87% had seen those billboards but not really reflected upon their message or discussed it with any of their peers.

When we showed them these billboards in class, they had a hard time making sense out of them.

Reason 5 material provided for children does not go beyond the obvious

One of the campaign’s objectives is raising awareness through community outreach programs. As well, a web page was created that offers kids information about how to better protect themselves in chat rooms. For instance, children or parents can fill out an online survey about chat security, as shown here:

4th grader do know this Here you can find more information about this important campaign:

schau genau campaign – city of Zurich – 6 chat tips

A group of 4th graders in and their teacher from a school in Zurich developed a guide for better chat security.Their checklist builds on the above standards while focusing and illustrating issues that children will face and must make decisions about whenjoining chat rooms,signing up for MySpace Switzerland orusing Google Talk or Skype for chatting and Voice over IP.Get the kids and their teacher’s suggestions here:

Safer Internet Day 2008 – 5 Regeln fuer den sicheren Online Chat

Reason 6 the campaign is not reaching into classrooms

While the campaign is being a joint project between the city’s police and the school department, teacher’s and their pupils seem not to have been made part of this campaign.

We asked numerous school teachers around town. Few if any head heard about the campaign. At the same time, however, information technology and web tools are being pushed in the classroom and children search Google for information, use YouTube and many other tools for their school work and pleasure.

We dare to ask if better coordination might not have given this campaign a bigger return on investment on an issue that is vital to our children’s safety and security

Reason7 the campaign does not reach out for support by getting children and teenagers to communicate through a blog to other school pupils

Adults communicating with teenagers is a challenge. Any teacher or parent can attest to this. Hence, a campaign wanting to reach children needs to get them involved.

Another way would be using the social media that is getting ever more popular with school kids, offer a blog on the schau genau campaign’s web page

School pupils are getting into blogging and, most importantly, they address Internet security, privacy and sexual exploitation on their blogs:

Schuelerblog der 4. Klasse aus dem Schulkreis Limmattal – Zuerich .

Blogging would have helped getting the conversation about the campaign spread faster. As well it would more likely continue to be discussed in school hallways and raise awareness

CyTRAP Labs’ take on this issue

We believe the schau genau campaign launched by the city of Zurich against sexual exploitation in chat rooms is a very important effort undertaken to better protect our children. No doubt about it.

There remains much to be done and even less time left. Unfortunately, in many countries including Switzerland and Zurich, teachers are pretty much left to their own devices when it comes to helping kids to protect themselves on the net.

How can parents help their kids regarding Internet safety when children know already more about the subject than their parents do?

So where are the tools, skills and know-how for better protection against cybercrime and online pedophiles supposed to come from if neither the average teacher nor parent knows more than the kid? And just to make sure, the kids are more often than not extremely careless until teachers have spent a few hours explaining and demonstrating to them in the classroom what it means to make a mistake …..

Coordination of such campagins usually helps in reaching more people than if one goes alone. If you need an example, just look at this year’s Safer Internet Day 2008 – its 5th year anniversary (2008-02-12) shows, each year the campaign has had a greater success by involving ever more children around the globe.

Remember, finding the right medium in a sea of choices is fast becoming more important than the message itself. Coordination with other activities such as the Safer Internet Day 2008 and its blogothone helps reaching children through different channels, including traditional media, internet, billboards, rock concerts and blogs.

So while Zurich is walking down the right path, much remains to be done….

PS. The ‘schau genau’ campagin runs during spring 2008 (started in January) and again in Fall 2008. The city is spending about Euro600,000 for billboards, the campaign’s webpage and so on.
============>

If this post was helpful to you, please consider stumbling it or subscribing to feeds from CyTRAP Labs. Cheers.

==========>

Also of interest:

the mission of ComMetrics

8 reasons that speak for having a corporate blog

==========>

  • http://www.mikefook.com Mike Fook Fiction

    Nice article. I’m in agreement 100%. Pedophiles are the lowest form of life on the planet. To steal a child’s innocence is the worst thing I can imagine. :( I advocate even stronger reaction. Vigilantism. It’s strange, but I wrote a book completely ANTI-pedophile and you know how many publishers will consider it? Exactly none that I’ve reached. Nobody will touch it. There’s something wrong with that as well – if we don’t publicize ANTI pedophilia books and efforts just because it deals with a subject we’d rather igore – that’s wrong. Pedophiles in Thailand? You bet… Thanks for a great article, Mike.

  • http://ReguStand.CyTRAP.eu WebUrs

    Dear Mike

    Thanks for the comment, I agree but I want to point out that it takes collaboration beyond a city and one country.

    We need to find these people and throw the book at them. Unfortunately, the city of Zurich’s campaign fails for various reasons. For starters, neither children (possible victims of sexual exploitation on the Internet) nor parents seem to get the message when they see these billboards. Failure in communication, unfortunately, a costly one.

    So let us continue to collaborate. Moreover, raising awareness helps and teaching kids in taking the necessary measures in cyberspace to better protect themselves is the key.

    Meaning – achieve behavioral change – being more careful is one thing doing it is what matters. Thanks for commenting.

    Cheers WebUrs

  • http://climbtothestars.org Stephanie Booth

    There is a bigger issue here — which I try to explain each time I get a chance, to the point I’m starting to feel hoarse.

    Maybe the message is not the right one? The campaign, as well as your article, takes as a starting point that “adults posing as kids” are the threat that chatrooms pose to our children.

    Research shows that this is not a widespread risk. It also shows that there is no correlation between handing out personal information online and the risk of falling victim to a sexual predator. Yet our campaigns continue to be built on the false assumptions that not handing out personal information will keep a kid “safe”, and that there is danger in the shape of people lying about their identity, in the first place.

    There is a disconnect between the language the campaigns speak and what they advocate (you point that out well in your article, I think), and the experience kids and teenagers have of life online (“they talk to strangers all the time, and nothing bad happens; they meet people from online, and they are exactly who they said they were; hence, all this “safety” information is BS”). But there is also a larger disconnect, which is that the danger these campaigns claim to address is not well understood. Check out the 5th quote in the long article I wrote on the subject at the time of the MySpace PR stunt about deleting “sex offenders'” profiles.

    I will blog more about this, but wanted to point this out here first.

  • http://ReguStand.CyTRAP.eu Urs E. Gattiker

    Dear Steph,
    you say: there might be a bigger issue here ==> I say YES AGREED :-)

    Nevertheless, maybe we are talking about different things, I was writing about the need for coordinating campaigns. Zurich’s citywide campaign does little if anything to improve cyber safety. It focuses on one small but important issue and wastes resources by not using various multipliers to get a bigger bang for the buck.

    Most importantly, giving children a chance to acquire the proper information security skills needed for a safer surfing experience must be the main thrust of any such campaigns financed by public funds. The Zurich campaign falls short on all these benchmarks.

    You are referring to lists that register accused and convicted ‘offenders’ primarily in the U.S. and UK:

    MySpace Banning Sex Offenders: Online Predator Paranoia

    I read the above post but it focuses on the U.S. and the UK in particular. However, we should not ignore cultural differences on this subject. UK and US have a special way in looking at these issues and dealing with them which is not always easy to understand as a bystander froma cross the pond, see here:

    Regulation that matters – how spyware pop-ups got a substitute teacher to face jail time

    Hence, I still believe learning how to surf safer is neither a one-day event nor a 2-week campaign. As as we have discovered working with 10 year olds in a primary school, it is similar to learning math, it is a journey where one learns, practices and learns again – with ups and downs:

    Safer Internet Day 2008

    So what does it mean? I believe that children need to acquire more practical skills when it comes to protecting their privacy online. The latter includes learning how to handle cyber-bullies, computer viruses and reducing the risks for becoming a victim of a phishing attack:

    Safer Internet Day 2008 – 5 Regeln fuer den sicheren Online Chat

    10-year olds may be vulnerable by revealing too much information that they should not when registering for Facebook or MySpace for that matter. Setting the privacy options right helps and so on….. (see above post where kids share what they did to protect themselves on Google Talk, MySpace, Facebook, etc.)

    Therefore, we agree that sex offenders or pedophiles are a concern when it comes to the safety of our children. Nevertheless, I agree with you, we should not go overboard (e.g., consider the number and percentage of cases in comparison to total number of Internet users, differences across age groups and countries, etc.). Finally, we owe it to our kids to teach them the basics.

    Zurich employs 10 police officers full-time to go from school to school teaching kids road safety. Important stuff but there is ZERO AND I REPEAT ZERO budget for teaching kids cyber-safety…… Until we get a line into our schools’ budgets entitled: cyber-safety and security skills — things will neither improve for our teachers (i.e. left to their own devices to deal with this) nor will our children know how to move around safely in cyberspace.

    Thank you for your post.

    PS. And it’s the same in Basel, Berne, Geneva, Frankfurt, Brussels and Amsterdam to mention a few more European cities. Budget for teaching road-safety in schools, unfortunately, no budget line to give resources to school districts to teach cybersecurity.

  • http://climbtothestars.org Stephanie Booth

    Personally, I’d rather speak of “media literacy” than “internet safety”. The internet isn’t something that is inherently more dangerous than life. However, because it is not well understood, it creates problem. Focusing on the “sexual predator” issue is in my opinion detrimental, because it increases fear of the internet amongst those who do not know it well, and prompts “silly” consequences like the teacher you mention who got in trouble because of pop-up windows, or the MySpace Sex Offender affair. It also takes attention away from other issues (which you mention, and which the Ofcon study I’ve been reading mentions) with online presence (around privacy, managing one’s online persona, etc).

  • http://ReguStand.CyTRAP.eu Urs E. Gattiker

    Semantics, media literacy, Internet safety, whatever we call it, school children must know how to protect their rights AND how to act responsibly when using new or old media.

    But I think we agree on this one. It is important and we are often getting hooked on not soooo important issues, instead of focusing on the main one RIGHTS AND RESPONSBILITIES

Previous post:

Next post: